Recently the TSE/OSC Mining Standards Task Force released a report including a key recommendation to formalize and enhance the Qualified Person ("QP") concept in the Canadian mining industry.
The implementation of the Qualified Person concept has had a major impact on junior mining companies.
A QP is defined as "an individual, who is an engineer or geoscientist with at least 5 years experience in mineral exploration, mine development, operations or project assessment, including experience relevant to the subject matter of the project or report, and is a member in good standing of a recognized professional association".
A QP is to be responsible for:
- All scientific and technical matters relating to the design, implementation and assessment of a mineral exploration, development program or a mining operation, including the procedures and practices followed, using industry standards;
- The estimation and classification of resources and reserves; and
- The review, approval and, where required, certification of all scientific and technical reports and disclosure for public and regulatory purposes relating to a mineral exploration, development program, mining operation or estimates of resources and reserves.
A QP can be an in-house person, but there are specific circumstances where reports must be prepared by a QP who is independent of the company.
These are technical reports filed by a mining company in connection with:
- Becoming a reporting issuer;
- Filing a listing application;
- Filing a prospectus that is not eligible for the POP system;
- The first disclosure of, or a 100% change in, estimates of material resources or reserves, unless the company has resource revenues of at least $50 million per year averaged over the last three years; or
- A valuation that is required by securities legislation.
In practice however, many companies are retaining independent QP’s in an expanded role which includes a technical review their projects on an ongoing basis. This affords management and directors of the company, as well as investors and regulatory authorities, with an additional level of comfort. An added benefit of such an ongoing review is that when an independent report is required, the independent QP is already familiar with the project and has signed off on the work. Thus, the reports can be prepared in a timely and cost effective manner and no unpleasant surprises are encountered.
WGM is ideally suited to this kind of a QP role. WGM is a long established firm with an excellent reputation. Our geologists have extensive experience in a variety of geological environments worldwide. With its experience in geological, mining and metallurgical aspects of projects, WGM is in an excellent position to be involved in the project from initial exploration through to production.
In carrying out these type of assignments, WGM typically reviews work plans, budgets, exploration progress, and results, and provides the client with its comments on the suitability of the programs on a monthly basis in a letter report format. WGM evaluates the geologic models considered, and provides advice on exploration strategies. This includes advice on the best practices to be followed, and the quality control required to ensure the validity of the exploration data. WGM reviews exploration results provided by the client, including monthly progress reports, and provides the client with an independent opinion on the significance of the results. WGM also reviews public disclosure by the client prior to release to verify that the disclosure is technically accurate. Recommendations are made as to appropriate follow-up exploration. As required, WGM makes site visits to enable it to be able to independently verify exploration results.
WGM’s role is strictly advisory and the client remains entirely responsible for the management and execution of the exploration program.
A particular concern, especially for junior mining companies is the cost of this work. By initiating a regular reporting system and setting up reporting standards in conjunction with the client, high quality monthly reports are prepared by the client’s field personnel. These minimize the time required to review the data, thereby reducing the cost to the client. They also provide the client with a record of exploration results and progress.
The greatest proportion of the cost is usually associated with site visits. These can be significant for remote properties overseas. WGM staff regularly travels to many areas of the globe. Whenever possible, these site visits are organized so that costs can be shared by more than one client.
The ongoing review process is cost effective as WGM as the QP is familiar with current data and can readily prepare specific reports required by regulatory authorities. As a result, when such reports are required, a significant proportion of the cost of the ongoing review is recouped in the cost savings achieved in the preparation of the report.
Therefore, the net cost of the ongoing review of a project by an independent Qualified Person is very minimal, while affording the client and its investors an additional level of comfort that the work being carried out is of the highest quality.